Getty Images
Are we within the midst of a wellbeing pandemic? The query could seem curious, even contradictory. But go searching, the idea is in all places and spreading: within the media, in authorities establishments and transnational organisations, in faculties, in workplaces and within the market.
To be clear, it’s not simply wellbeing’s infectiousness in public discourse that makes it pandemic-like. It’s additionally the real malaise that may be brought on by the time period’s misuse and exploitation.
Do you sense, for instance, that your wellbeing is more and more being scrutinised by friends, managers and insurance coverage firms? Are you noticing an growing variety of ads providing services and products that promise enhanced wellbeing by consumption? If so, you’re not alone.
But we additionally have to ask whether or not this obsession with wellbeing is having the alternative to the specified impact. To perceive why, it’s necessary to take a look at the origins, politics and complexities of wellbeing, together with its strategic deployment within the strategy of what we name “wellbeing washing”.
The halo impact
While issues about wellbeing might be traced to antiquity, the time period has emerged as a central characteristic of up to date social life. One clarification is that it’s typically conflated with ideas as numerous as happiness, high quality of life, life satisfaction, human flourishing, mindfulness and “wellness”.
Wellbeing is versatile, within the sense that it may be simply inserted into a various vary of contexts. But it’s additionally surrounded by a sort of halo, mechanically bestowed with a constructive that means, just like ideas comparable to motherhood, democracy, freedom and liberty.
To contest the worth and significance of such issues is to danger being labelled a troublemaker, a non-believer, unpatriotic or worse.
Read extra:
Wellbeing wants a rethink – and a worldwide outlook is the way in which to start out
These days, there are two essential ideas of wellbeing. The first – subjective wellbeing – emphasises a holistic measure of a person’s psychological, bodily and religious well being. This perspective is probably greatest mirrored within the World Health Organization’s WHO-5 Index, designed in 1998 to measure folks’s subjective wellbeing in line with 5 states: cheerfulness, calmness, vigour, restfulness and fulfilment.
Translated into greater than 30 languages, the general affect of the WHO-5 Index shouldn’t be underestimated; each governments and firms have embraced it and carried out coverage primarily based on it.
But the validity of the index, and others prefer it, has been questioned. They’re susceptible to oversimplification and an inclination to marginalise various views, together with Indigenous approaches to bodily and psychological well being.
Individual accountability
The second perspective – goal wellbeing – was a response to rising social inequality. It focuses on providing an alternative choice to GDP as a measure of total nationwide prosperity.
One instance of that is New Zealand’s Living Standards Framework, which is guided by 4 working ideas: distribution, resilience, productiveness and sustainability. These new and purportedly extra progressive measures of nationwide financial and social outcomes sign societal change, optimism and hope.
The hassle with such initiatives, nonetheless, is that they continue to be rooted inside a specific neoliberal paradigm through which particular person behaviour is the linchpin for change, fairly than the broader political and financial buildings round us.
Read extra:
Beyond GDP: altering how we measure progress is vital to tackling a world in disaster – three main specialists
Arguably, this interprets into extra monitoring and “disciplining” of non-public actions and actions. Intentionally or not, many organisations interpret and use
wellbeing ideas and insurance policies to strengthen current buildings and hierarchies.
Consider how the wellbeing agenda is enjoying out in your organisation or office, for instance. Chances are you’ve gotten seen the expansion of latest departments, work items or committees, insurance policies and packages, wellness workshops – all supposedly linked to well being and wellbeing.
You could even have seen the creation of latest roles: wellbeing coaches, groups or “champions”. If not, then “lurk with intent” and be looking out for the emergence of yoga and meditation choices, nature walks and a spread of different “funtivities” to help your wellbeing.
Wellbeing washing
The hazard is that such initiatives now represent one other semi-obligatory work activity, to the extent that non-participation may result in stigmatisation. This solely provides to emphasize and, certainly, unwellness.
Deployed poorly or cynically, such schemes symbolize points of “wellbeing washing”. It’s a strategic try to make use of language, imagery, insurance policies and practices as a part of an organisation’s “tradition” to connote one thing constructive and virtuous.
Read extra:
Pilates, fruit and Amazon’s zen cubicles: why office wellbeing efforts can fall quick
In actuality, it may be designed to reinforce productiveness and cut back prices, minimise and handle reputational danger, and promote conformity, management and surveillance.
Ultimately, we argue that wellbeing now constitutes a “area of energy”; not a impartial territory, however a spot the place events advance their very own pursuits, typically on the expense of others. As such, it’s important that students, policymakers and residents discover, as one creator put it, “what and whose values are represented, which accounts dominate, what’s their influence and on whom”.
Because if wellbeing is changing into a pandemic, we could nicely want the “vaccine” of vital reflection.
The authors don’t work for, seek the advice of, personal shares in or obtain funding from any firm or group that might profit from this text, and have disclosed no related affiliations past their educational appointment.
